<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Expert Party Wall Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com</link>
	<description>The Party Wall Solicitor.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:23:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Calculate Compensation for breaching the Party Wall Act</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/14/compensation-for-breaching-the-party-wall-act/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/14/compensation-for-breaching-the-party-wall-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Where the building owner infringes an adjoining owners property rights, for example by enclosing upon their wall, or by attaching something to it, the surveyors may be called upon to value those infringements in an award of damages, or compensation. But how should surveyors approach this task? The Court of Appeal have helpfully given guidance on [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/14/compensation-for-breaching-the-party-wall-act/">How to Calculate Compensation for breaching the Party Wall Act</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/14/compensation-for-breaching-the-party-wall-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party Wall Notices and Joint Owners</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/01/party-wall-notices-and-joint-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/01/party-wall-notices-and-joint-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Notices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tricky situations can arise where there is more than one owner of land or buildings that are subject to the Party Wall Act, as it may not be possible to locate all of the owners. Can a notice be served if only one of the building owners is available? What happens if all of the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/01/party-wall-notices-and-joint-owners/">Party Wall Notices and Joint Owners</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/05/01/party-wall-notices-and-joint-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is an Adjoining Owner?</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/16/definition-of-adjoining-owner/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/16/definition-of-adjoining-owner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Notices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before the building owner starts work he must serve one or more notices on the “adjoining owner”. But who are they? The neighbours, right? Well yes, but it is not necessarily that simple “Adjoining owner” is defined in section 20 of the 1996 Act as “any owner … of buildings, storeys, or room adjoining those of the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/16/definition-of-adjoining-owner/">Who is an Adjoining Owner?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/16/definition-of-adjoining-owner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party Wall Injunctions &amp; Costs &#8211; Nelson&#8217;s Yard Management Co v Eziefula</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/10/nelsons-yard-management-co-v-eziefula/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/10/nelsons-yard-management-co-v-eziefula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Injunctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court of Appeal recently gave judgment in Nelson&#8217;s Yard Management Co v Eziefula [2013] EWCA Civ 235, a case concerning whether the defendant should bear the costs of an aborted application for an injunction for breach of the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.  Background Nelson&#8217;s Yard Management Company (&#8220;Nelson&#8217;s&#8221;) is the freehold owner of 1 [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/10/nelsons-yard-management-co-v-eziefula/">Party Wall Injunctions &#038; Costs &#8211; Nelson&#8217;s Yard Management Co v Eziefula</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/10/nelsons-yard-management-co-v-eziefula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boundary Disputes 3 &#8211; Adverse Possession</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/02/boundary-disputes-solicitors-london/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/02/boundary-disputes-solicitors-london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boundary Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In my last posts here and here I looked at how to establish who is the &#8220;paper owner&#8221; of the land subject to a boundary dispute; that is, the person that owns the land according to the deeds. But this is only half the story.  Even if it can be shown that one person is [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/02/boundary-disputes-solicitors-london/">Boundary Disputes 3 &#8211; Adverse Possession</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/04/02/boundary-disputes-solicitors-london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boundary Disputes 2 &#8211; The Surveyor&#8217;s Report</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/03/19/boundary-dispute-solicitors-woking-surrey/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/03/19/boundary-dispute-solicitors-woking-surrey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boundary Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Trespass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In my last post I explained that the starting point in any boundary dispute is to find and analyse the first conveyance. In this post I will cover the next stage, which is to commission a boundary surveyor’s report. The Court of Appeal set out what the surveyor should be asked to do in the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/03/19/boundary-dispute-solicitors-woking-surrey/">Boundary Disputes 2 &#8211; The Surveyor&#8217;s Report</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/03/19/boundary-dispute-solicitors-woking-surrey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boundary Disputes 1 &#8211; Find the First Conveyance</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/28/boundary-dispute-solicitors-london-1/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/28/boundary-dispute-solicitors-london-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boundary Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Trespass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following on from my earlier post, this is the first in a series that will set out the approach that the Courts and Land Registry Adjudicator will adopt when resolving boundary disputes. Although often the first thing the parties look at is the Land Registry and Ordinance Survey plans, they are simply not relevant in [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/28/boundary-dispute-solicitors-london-1/">Boundary Disputes 1 &#8211; Find the First Conveyance</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/28/boundary-dispute-solicitors-london-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today is the Roman festival of “Terminalia”…..</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/23/terminalia/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/23/terminalia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boundary Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Trespass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>….. which celebrates the Roman god Terminus, who was tasked with the protection of boundary markers. Where Roman estates adjoined they were marked with a boundary stones which usually included a statute of Terminus (pictured) Each year on 23 February, Roman land owners would celebrate with neighbouring families garlanding their respective sides of the marker [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/23/terminalia/">Today is the Roman festival of “Terminalia”…..</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2013/02/23/terminalia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basement Excavations &amp; Damages for Loss of Value</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/11/29/basement-excavations-damages-for-loss-of-value/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/11/29/basement-excavations-damages-for-loss-of-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Case Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Basement excavations are becoming increasingly popular in London and the South-East, and I am often asked to advise on the impact the works may have on the value of adjoining premises. This issue arises particularly where the basement is to be constructed in such a way that it might prevent future development of neighbouring properties. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/11/29/basement-excavations-damages-for-loss-of-value/">Basement Excavations &#038; Damages for Loss of Value</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/11/29/basement-excavations-damages-for-loss-of-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party Walls and “Raising Downwards”</title>
		<link>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/09/27/party-walls-and-raising-downwards/</link>
		<comments>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/09/27/party-walls-and-raising-downwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hearsum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Wall Notices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partywallsolicitor.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This post started life as part of a discussion on LinkedIn, but I thought the subject deserved more lengthy treatment. An unfortunately common idea, particularly in relation to basement excavations, is that a building owner can &#8220;raise a party wall downwards”. It is often used to avoid the absolute restriction on special foundations without the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/09/27/party-walls-and-raising-downwards/">Party Walls and “Raising Downwards”</a> appeared first on <a href="http://partywallsolicitor.com">Expert Party Wall Solicitors</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://partywallsolicitor.com/2012/09/27/party-walls-and-raising-downwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
